Fragility functions for corroded reinforced concrete columns
Fragility functions for corroded reinforced concrete columns
ES评分0
| DOI | https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108124 |
| 刊名 |
|
| 年,卷(期) | 2024, (108124) |
| 作者 |
|
| 作者单位 |
1. School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, 450001, China 2. College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin, 541004, China 3. School of Civil Engineering, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin, 150090, China |
| 摘要 |
Fragility functions for structural members play an important role in the FEMA P-58 methodology for the seismic performance assessment of structures. In this study, fragility functions were developed for aged reinforced columns with corroded reinforcing bars. To this end, an experimental database containing 120 specimens subjected to repeated cyclic loads was compiled from 20 previous studies. The experimental specimens were categorized into three groups: no corrosion damage (NCD), low corrosion damage (LCD), and high corrosion damage (HCD). These damage states were identified by experimental hysteretic responses in terms of the drift angle, which are linked to common methods of repair, including structural repair, structural enhancement, and component replacement. The obtained drift angles were used to fit the log-normal fragility functions of the NCD, LCD, and HCD columns. The effect of reinforcement corrosion was examined by comparing the fragility functions of uncorroded and corroded columns. According to the principles suggested by FEMA P-58, the developed fragility functions were mostly judged to have a high level of quality. The fragility medians of the corroded columns showed a clear decreasing trend along with an increasing degree of corrosion damage. However, the corrosion of the reinforcing bars had a limited effect on the fragility dispersion. The maximum differences in the exceedance probability were calculated by comparing the fragility curves for the LCD and NCD columns, which were greater than 20 % for all concerned damage states. For the HCD columns, the corrosion of the reinforcing bars led to the maximum difference in the exceedance probability, even beyond 50 %, compared to the results for the NCD columns. The above results reveal the significant effect of the corrosion of the reinforcing bars. The specific fragility functions developed for the corroded reinforced concrete columns will facilitate the seismic loss and resilience assessment of aging reinforced concrete building structures.
|
| Abstract |
Fragility functions for structural members play an important role in the FEMA P-58 methodology for the seismic performance assessment of structures. In this study, fragility functions were developed for aged reinforced columns with corroded reinforcing bars. To this end, an experimental database containing 120 specimens subjected to repeated cyclic loads was compiled from 20 previous studies. The experimental specimens were categorized into three groups: no corrosion damage (NCD), low corrosion damage (LCD), and high corrosion damage (HCD). These damage states were identified by experimental hysteretic responses in terms of the drift angle, which are linked to common methods of repair, including structural repair, structural enhancement, and component replacement. The obtained drift angles were used to fit the log-normal fragility functions of the NCD, LCD, and HCD columns. The effect of reinforcement corrosion was examined by comparing the fragility functions of uncorroded and corroded columns. According to the principles suggested by FEMA P-58, the developed fragility functions were mostly judged to have a high level of quality. The fragility medians of the corroded columns showed a clear decreasing trend along with an increasing degree of corrosion damage. However, the corrosion of the reinforcing bars had a limited effect on the fragility dispersion. The maximum differences in the exceedance probability were calculated by comparing the fragility curves for the LCD and NCD columns, which were greater than 20 % for all concerned damage states. For the HCD columns, the corrosion of the reinforcing bars led to the maximum difference in the exceedance probability, even beyond 50 %, compared to the results for the NCD columns. The above results reveal the significant effect of the corrosion of the reinforcing bars. The specific fragility functions developed for the corroded reinforced concrete columns will facilitate the seismic loss and resilience assessment of aging reinforced concrete building structures.
|
| 关键词 |
Fragility function;Reinforced concrete;Corrosion;Damage states;Repair method
|
| KeyWord |
Fragility function;Reinforced concrete;Corrosion;Damage states;Repair method
|
| 基金项目 | |
| 页码 | - |
[1] J. Moehle, G.G. Deierlein, A framework for performance-based earthquake resistive design
[C], in: Proceedings of the 13th World Conference on Earthquake
Engineering, 2004. Paper No. 679.
[2] Building Seismic Safety Council (US), Applied Technology Council, NEHRP guidelines for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings, Federal Emergency
Management Agency, 1997.
[3] C.A. Cornell, H. Krawinkler, Progress and challenges in seismic performance assessment, PEER Cent. News 3 (2000).
[4] Applied Technology Council (ATC), Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings Volume 1 – Methodology. FEMA P-58-1, Fed Emerg Manag Agency, 2018,
p. 1.
[5] Applied Technology Council (ATC), Guidelines for Seismic Performance Assessment of Buildings (ATC-58), Applied Technology Council, 2008. http://www.
atcouncil.org/atc-58.shtml.
[6] K. Porter, R. Kennedy, R. Bachman, Creating fragility functions for performance-based earthquake engineering, Earthq. Spectra 23 (2007), https://doi.org/
10.1193/1.2720892.
[7] P.C. Brown, L.N. Lowes, Fragility functions for modern reinforced-concrete beam-column joints, Earthq. Spectra 23 (2007), https://doi.org/10.1193/
1.2723150.
[8] C. Goksu, Fragility functions for reinforced concrete columns incorporating recycled aggregates, Eng. Struct. 233 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engstruct.2021.111908.
[9] Applied Technology Council (ATC), Background document: fragility functions for reinforced concrete moment frames, in: FEMA P-58/BD-3.8.6, Fed Emerg
Manag Agency, 2012, p. 1.
[10] Applied Technology Council (ATC), Background document: fragility curves for components of steel SMF systems, in: FEMA P-58/BD-3.8.3, Fed Emerg Manag
Agency, 2012, p. 1.
[11] Applied Technology Council (ATC), Background Document: Fragility Curves for Wood Light-Frame Structural Systems. FEMA P-58/BD-3.8.1, Fed Emerg Manag
Agency, 2012, p. 1.
[12] Applied Technology Council (ATC), Background document: damage states and fragility curves for reinforced masonry shear walls, in: FEMA P-58/BD-3.8.10,
Fed Emerg Manag Agency, 2012, p. 1.
[13] Applied Technology Council (ATC), PACT User Manual. FEMA P-58, Fed Emerg Manag Agency, 2018.
[14] T. Güner, C. Topkaya, Performance comparison of BRBFs designed using different response modification factors, Eng. Struct. 225 (2020), https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.engstruct.2020.111281.
[15] D. Cardone, Fragility curves and loss functions for RC structural components with smooth rebars, Earthq. Struct. 10 (2016), https://doi.org/10.12989/
eas.2016.10.5.1181.
[16] C.M. Ramirez, D.G. Lignos, E. Miranda, D. Kolios, Fragility functions for pre-Northridge welded steel moment-resisting beam-to-column connections, Eng.
Struct. 45 (2012), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.07.007.
[17] H. Bouazza, M. Djelil, M. Matallah, On the relevance of incorporating bar slip, bar buckling and low-cycle fatigue effects in seismic fragility assessment of RC
bridge piers, Eng. Struct. 256 (2022), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114032.
[18] K. Tuutti, Corrosion of Steel in Concrete, Swedish Cement and Concrete Research Institute, 1982.
[19] X.L. Rong, S.S. Zheng, Y.X. Zhang, L.G. Dong, H. Liu, K.Y. Dai, Seismic behavior of frost-damaged squat RC shear walls under artificial climate environment: a
further experimental research, Arch. Civ. Mech. Eng. 20 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s43452-020-00081-7.
[20] K. Dai, X. Yu, D. Lu, N. Sunil, H. Lucas, Seismic performance assessment of corroded RC frame structures with plain steel bars: a case study in New Zealand,
Tumu Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civ. Eng. J. 53 (2020) 53–60.
[21] Y. Ma, Y. Che, J. Gong, Behavior of corrosion damaged circular reinforced concrete columns under cyclic loading, Construct. Build. Mater. 29 (2012), https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.002.
[22] H. Cheng, H.N. Li, F. Biondini, D.S. Wang, Y. Zou, Strain penetration effect on cyclic response of corroded RC columns, Eng. Struct. (2021) 243, https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.112653.
[23] X. Ge, M.S. Dietz, N.A. Alexander, M.M. Kashani, Nonlinear dynamic behaviour of severely corroded reinforced concrete columns: shaking table study, Bull.
Earthq. Eng. 18 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00749-3.
[24] M.M. Kashani, A.J. Crewe, N.A. Alexander, Nonlinear stress-strain behaviour of corrosion-damaged reinforcing bars including inelastic buckling, Eng. Struct. 48
(2013), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2012.09.034.
[25] G. Zhang, B. Li, The corrosion of stirrups and its effect on the seismic fragility of a corroded reinforced concrete (RC) column, WIT Trans. Inf. Commun. Technol.
47 (2014), https://doi.org/10.2495/RISK140281.
[26] S.Y. Yang, X.B. Song, H.X. Jia, X. Chen, X.L. Liu, Experimental research on hysteretic behaviors of corroded reinforced concrete columns with different
maximum amounts of corrosion of rebar, Construct. Build. Mater. (2016), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.002.
[27] H.S. Lee, T. Kage, T. Noguchi, F. Tomosawa, An experimental study on the retrofitting effects of reinforced concrete columns damaged by rebar corrosion
strengthened with carbon fiber sheets, Cement Concr. Res. (2003), https://doi.org/10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01004-9.
[28] Q.X. Shi, D.T. Niu, G.Y. Yan, Experimental study on the restoring force performance of corroded reinforced concrete flexural members under repeated load,
Earthq. Eng. Eng. Vib. 20 (4) (2000) 44–50 (in Chinese).
[29] C. Goksu, A. Ilki, Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete columns with corroded deformed reinforcing bars, ACI Struct. J. (2016), https://doi.org/10.14359/
51689030.
[30] J. Gong, W. Zhong, G. Zhao, Experimental study on low-cycle behavior of corroded reinforced concrete member under eccentric compression, J. Build. Struct.
25 (5) (2004) 92–104 (in Chinese).
[31] J. Li, J. Gong, L. Wang, Seismic behavior of corrosion-damaged reinforced concrete columns strengthened using combined carbon fiber-reinforced polymer and
steel jacket, Construct. Build. Mater. (2009), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2009.01.003.
[32] L.J. Jiang, Y.S. Yuan, Experimental study on mechanical properties of corroded reinforced concrete columns under repeated loads, Gongye Jianzhu /Industrial
Construction 42 (2) (2012) 66–69 (in Chinese).
[33] S. Zheng, L. Dong, H. Zuo, Q. Qin, W. Liu, Q. Li, Experimental investigation on seismic behaviors of corroded RC frame columns in artificial climate, Jianzhu
Jiegou Xuebao/Journal Build Struct (2018), https://doi.org/10.14006/j.jzjgxb.2018.04.004 (in Chinese).
[34] Y.L. Xia, Study on Repeated Load Test of Damaged Reinforced Concrete Column Joints, Master Thesis, 2014 (in Chinese).
[35] L.F. Zhang, Seismic Behavior of Corroded Reinforced Concrete Columns of Low-Rise Buildings, Master Thesis, 2016 (in Chinese).
[36] H. Funaki, T. Yamakawa, K. Nakada, Experimental studies on durability and seismic performance of real-scaled RC columns exposed at a coastal area in
Okinawa, J. Struct. Constr. Eng. (2011), https://doi.org/10.3130/aijs.76.1479 (in Japanese).
[37] T. Yamakawa, S. Iraha, Y. Tamaki, et al., An experimental study on aseismatic behavior of R/C columns subjected to electro- chemical corrosion damage,
J. Concr. Eng. 16 (1) (1994) 805–810 (in Japanese).
[38] H. Shinzato, T. Yamakawa, Y. Morishita, An Experimental study on seismic performance of RC columns damaged by exposure field test, Proc. Jpn. Concr. Inst.
25 (2) (2003) 259–264 (in Japanese).
[39] K.-Y. Dai, C. Liu, D.-G. Lu, X.-H. Yu, Experimental investigation on seismic behavior of corroded RC columns under artificial climate environment and
electrochemical chloride extraction: a comparative study, Construct. Build. Mater. 242 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118014.
[40] K.-Y. Dai, D.-G. Lu, X.-H. Yu, Experimental investigation on the seismic performance of corroded reinforced concrete columns designed with low and high axial
load ratios, J. Build. Eng. (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102615.
[41] N.S. Vu, B. Li, Seismic performance of flexural reinforced concrete columns with corroded reinforcement, ACI Struct. J. 115 (2018), https://doi.org/10.14359/
51702372.
[42] H. Yalciner, A. Kumbasaroglu, Experimental evaluation and modeling of corroded reinforced concrete columns, ACI Struct. J. 117 (2020), https://doi.org/
10.14359/51721372.
[43] A. Celik, H. Yalciner, A. Kumbasaroglu, A.I. Turan, Cyclic Loading Test on Highly Corroded Reinforced Concrete Columns, fib Symp., 2021.
[44] C. Cao, S.S. Zheng, W.B. Hu, L.G. Dong, X.R. Liu, Seismic behavior of reinforced concrete frame joints in coastal atmosphere, Adv. Civ. Eng. 3 (2020), https://
doi.org/10.1155/2020/1636539.
[45] B. Wang, Failure Mechanism and Degradation Model of RC Structure Corroded by Chloride Attack, Ph.D Thesis, 2012 (in Chinese).
[46] X. Liu, H. Jiang, L. He, Experimental investigation on seismic performance of corroded reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames, Eng. Struct. 153 (2017),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.034.
[47] W. Yuan, A. Guo, W. Yuan, H. Li, Experimental investigation on cyclic behavior of coastal bridge piers with non-uniform corrosion under biaxial quasi-static
loads, Construct. Build. Mater. 190 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.09.151.
[48] J. Li, Y. Li, Experimental and theoretical study on the seismic performance of corroded RC circular columns strengthened with hybrid fiber reinforced polymers,
Polym. Polym. Compos. 22 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1177/096739111402200801.
[49] Q. Zhang, J. Gong, Study on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete columns after ECE treatment, Construct. Build. Mater. 50 (2014), https://doi.org/10.1016/
j.conbuildmat.2013.10.001.
[50] H. Zheng, S. Zheng, Y. Zhang, Y. Cai, M. Ming, J. Zhou, Experimental investigation on seismic behaviours of reinforced concrete columns under simulated acid
rain environment, Adv. Civ. Eng. 2020 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/3826062.
[51] Q. Li, D tao Niu, Q hui Xiao, X. Guan, S jie Chen, Experimental study on seismic behaviors of concrete columns confined by corroded stirrups and lateral strength
prediction, Construct. Build. Mater. (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2017.09.030.
[52] S. Yin, Y. Yang, T. Ye, Y. Li, Experimental research on seismic behavior of reinforced concrete columns strengthened with TRC under corrosion environment,
J. Struct. Eng. 143 (2017), https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0001713.
[53] G. Ma, H. Li, H.J. Hwang, Seismic behavior of low-corroded reinforced concrete short columns in an over 20-year building structure, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng.
106 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2017.12.006.
[54] N.S. Vu, B. Li, Seismic performance assessment of corroded reinforced concrete short columns, J. Struct. Eng. 144 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)
st.1943-541x.0001994.
[55] K.Y. Dai, X.H. Yu, D.G. Lu, Phenomenological hysteretic model for corroded RC columns, Eng. Struct. 210 (2020), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engstruct.2020.110315.
[56] ACI committee 318, Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary (ACI 318M-11), 2011.
[57] ASCE, Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings (ASCE/SEI 41-17), 2017, https://doi.org/10.1061/9780784414859.
[58] L.N. Lowes, J. Li, Fragility functions for concrete moment frames, 9th US Natl. 10th Can. Conf. Earthq. Eng. 2010, Incl. Pap. from 4th Int. Tsunami Symp. 1
(2010).
[59] C.K. Gulec, A.S. Whittaker, J.D. Hooper, Fragility functions for low aspect ratio reinforced concrete walls, Eng. Struct. 32 (2010), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engstruct.2010.05.008.
[60] N.S. Vu, B. Yu, B. Li, Prediction of strength and drift capacity of corroded reinforced concrete columns, Construct. Build. Mater. 115 (2016), https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.04.048.
[61] D. Li, R. Wei, F. Xing, L. Sui, Y. Zhou, W. Wang, Influence of Non-uniform corrosion of steel bars on the seismic behavior of reinforced concrete columns,
Construct. Build. Mater. 167 (2018), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2018.01.149.
[62] A.D. Pan, J.P. Moehle, Experimental study of slab-column connections, ACI Struct. J. 89 (1992), https://doi.org/10.14359/4133.
[63] R. Park, Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from laboratory testing, Bull. New Zeal. Soc. Earthq. Eng. 22 (1989), https://doi.org/
10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.
[64] W.M. Ghannoum, A.B. Matamoros, Nonlinear modeling parameters and acceptance criteria for concrete columns, ACI Spec Publ 297 (2014).
[65] C.A. Pagni, L.N. Lowes, Fragility functions for older reinforced concrete beam-column joints, Earthq. Spectra 22 (2006), https://doi.org/10.1193/1.2163365.
[66] H. Aslani. Probabilistic earthquake loss estimation and loss disaggregation in buildings, Stanford University, 2005.
[67] FEMA 308. Repair of earthquake damaged concrete and masonry wall buildings, Fed. Emerg. Manag. Agency, 1998.
[68] ACI 546R-96: Concrete Repair Guide, American Concrete Institute, 1996.
[69] GB 50367-2015, Code for Design of Strengthening Concrete Structure, China architecture &building press, Beijing, 2015 (in Chinese).
[70] Y. Li, B.R. Ellingwood, Hurricane damage to residential construction in the US: importance of uncertainty modeling in risk assessment, Eng. Struct. 28 (2006),
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.11.005.
[71] Applied Technology Council (ATC), Fragility functions for slender reinforced concrete walls, in: FEMA P-58/BD-3.8.9, Fed Emerg Manag Agency, 2012, p. 1.
[72] S.M. Ross, Peirce’s criterion for the elimination of suspect experimental data, J. Eng. Technol. 20 (2003).
[73] G.S. Maddala, K. Lahiri, Introduction to Econometrics, second ed., MacMillan, New York, 1992, p. 89. ISBN 978-0-02-374545-4.
[74] F.E. Grubbs, Procedures for detecting outlying observations in samples, Technometrics 11 (1969), https://doi.org/10.1080/00401706.1969.10490657.
[75] H.W. Lilliefors, On the Kolmogorov-smirnov test for the exponential distribution with mean unknown, J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 64 (1969), https://doi.org/10.1080/
01621459.1969.10500983.
[76] X.H. Yu, K.Y. Dai, Y.S. Li, Variability in corrosion damage models and its effect on seismic collapse fragility of aging reinforced concrete frames, Construct.
Build. Mater. 295 (2021), https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123654.
[77] L. Di Sarno, F. Pugliese, Seismic fragility of existing RC buildings with corroded bars under earthquake sequences, Soil Dynam. Earthq. Eng. 134 (2020), https://
doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2020.106169.