相关学者

相关机构

Deformation capacity of FRP retrofitted reinforced concrete columns with corroded reinforcing bars

Deformation capacity of FRP retrofitted reinforced concrete columns with corroded reinforcing bars

ES评分7.88   

DOI https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2021.113834
刊名
年,卷(期) 2022, (113834)
作者
作者单位

1.School of Civil Engineering, Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450001, China 2.College of Civil Engineering and Architecture, Guilin University of Technology, Guilin 541004, China 3.Key Lab of Structures Dynamic Behavior and Control of the Ministry of Education, Harbin Institute of Technology, Harbin 150090, China

摘要
FRP retrofitting is an effective way to promote the degraded seismic capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns with corroded reinforcing bars. It is important to evaluate whether the performance of a corroded RC column meets the requirement of safety after FRP retrofitting. However, there is little available guidance for evaluating the deformation capacity of FRP retrofitted corroded columns. In this study, the test data of 63 FRP retrofitted corroded columns and 17 FRP retrofitted uncorroded columns under repeated cyclic loads are collected to establish a database. For each specimen, the rotation angles at yielding and ultimate states are determined from the backbone curve. The empirical prediction models are then developed for the yield and ultimate rotation angles of FRP retrofitted corroded columns, which include two parts: 1) the predicted rotation angle for the FRP retrofitted uncorroded RC column, and 2) a Corrosion Influence Factor (CIF) defined as the ratio between the rotation angles of the FRP retrofitted corroded columns to that of the FRP retrofitted uncorroded ones. The former part is represented using the available empirical prediction models, whereas the latter part is represented using the multi-linear relationships through stepwise regression with a backward elimination procedure. Through comparing with the experimental data, the developed empirical prediction models for the yield and ultimate rotation angles of FRP retrofitted corroded columns provide sufficient accuracy. Finally, the parameter “a” is determined in corresponding to different target probability of exceedance, which is required by the ASCE 41-compliant force versus displacement relation for FRP retrofitted corroded RC columns.
Abstract
FRP retrofitting is an effective way to promote the degraded seismic capacity of reinforced concrete (RC) columns with corroded reinforcing bars. It is important to evaluate whether the performance of a corroded RC column meets the requirement of safety after FRP retrofitting. However, there is little available guidance for evaluating the deformation capacity of FRP retrofitted corroded columns. In this study, the test data of 63 FRP retrofitted corroded columns and 17 FRP retrofitted uncorroded columns under repeated cyclic loads are collected to establish a database. For each specimen, the rotation angles at yielding and ultimate states are determined from the backbone curve. The empirical prediction models are then developed for the yield and ultimate rotation angles of FRP retrofitted corroded columns, which include two parts: 1) the predicted rotation angle for the FRP retrofitted uncorroded RC column, and 2) a Corrosion Influence Factor (CIF) defined as the ratio between the rotation angles of the FRP retrofitted corroded columns to that of the FRP retrofitted uncorroded ones. The former part is represented using the available empirical prediction models, whereas the latter part is represented using the multi-linear relationships through stepwise regression with a backward elimination procedure. Through comparing with the experimental data, the developed empirical prediction models for the yield and ultimate rotation angles of FRP retrofitted corroded columns provide sufficient accuracy. Finally, the parameter “a” is determined in corresponding to different target probability of exceedance, which is required by the ASCE 41-compliant force versus displacement relation for FRP retrofitted corroded RC columns.
关键词
Deformation capacity;Nonlinear modeling parameter;FRP;Corrosion;RC column
KeyWord
Deformation capacity;Nonlinear modeling parameter;FRP;Corrosion;RC column
基金项目
页码 -
  • 参考文献
  • 相关文献


[1] Enright MP, Frangopol DM. Probabilistic analysis of resistance degradation of
reinforced concrete bridge beams under corrosion. Eng Struct 1998;20(11):
960–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0141-0296(97)00190-9.

[2] Elghazy M, El Refai A, Ebead U, Nanni A. Effect of corrosion damage on the flexural
performance of RC beams strengthened with FRCM composites. Compos Struct
2017;180:994–1006. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.069.

[3] Su M-N, Zeng C, Li W-Q, Zhu J-H, Lin W-H, Ueda T, et al. Flexural performance of
corroded continuous RC beams rehabilitated by ICCP-SS. Compos Struct 2020;232:
111556. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111556.

[4] Wang Z-H, Li L, Zhang Y-X, Wang W-T. Bond-slip model considering freeze-thaw
damage effect of concrete and its application. Eng Struct 2019;201:109831.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2019.109831.

[5] Dong W, Li W, Vessalas K, He X, Sun Z, Sheng D. Piezoresistivity deterioration of
smart graphene nanoplate/cement-based sensors subjected to sulphuric acid
attack. Compos Commun 2021;23:100563. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
coco.2020.100563.

[6] Yu X-H, Dai K-Y, Li Y-S. Variability in corrosion damage models and its effect on
seismic collapse fragility of aging reinforced concrete frames. Constr Build Mater
2021;295:123654. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123654.

[7] Yalciner H, Sensoy S, Eren O. Seismic Performance Assessment of a Corroded 50-
Year-Old Reinforced Concrete Building. J Struct Eng 2015;141(12):05015001.
https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)ST.1943-541X.0001263.

[8] Liu X, Jiang H, He L. Experimental investigation on seismic performance of
corroded reinforced concrete moment-resisting frames. Eng Struct 2017;153:
639–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2017.10.034.

[9] Ge X, Dietz MS, Alexander NA, Kashani MM. Nonlinear dynamic behaviour of
severely corroded reinforced concrete columns: shaking table study. Bull Earthq
Eng 2020;18(4):1417–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10518-019-00749-3.

[10] Afsar Dizaj E, Kashani MM. Numerical investigation of the influence of cross-
sectional shape and corrosion damage on failure mechanisms of RC bridge piers
under earthquake loading. Bull Earthq Eng 2020;18(10):4939–61. https://doi.org/
10.1007/s10518-020-00883-3.

[11] Yu X-H, Qian K, Lu D-G, Li B. Progressive Collapse Behavior of Aging Reinforced
Concrete Structures Considering Corrosion Effects. J Perform Constr Facil 2017;31
(4):04017009. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CF.1943-5509.0001001.

[12] Yu X-H, Dai K-Y, Li Y-S, Li B. Seismic resilience assessment of corroded reinforced
concrete structures designed to the Chinese codes. Earthq Eng Eng Vib 2021;20(2):
303–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11803-021-2021-z.

[13] Yang S-Y, Song X-B, Jia H-X, Chen Xi, Liu X-L. Experimental research on hysteretic
behaviors of corroded reinforced concrete columns with different maximum
amounts of corrosion of rebar. Constr Build Mater 2016;121:319–27. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2016.06.002.

[14] Ma Y, Che Yi, Gong J. Behavior of corrosion damaged circular reinforced concrete
columns under cyclic loading. Constr Build Mater 2012;29:548–56. https://doi.
org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.11.002.

[15] Dai K-Y, Lu D-G, Yu X-H. Experimental investigation on the seismic performance of
corroded reinforced concrete columns designed with low and high axial load ratios.
J Build Eng 2021;44:102615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2021.102615.

[16] Dai K-Y, Liu C, Lu D-G, Yu X-H. Experimental investigation on seismic behavior of
corroded RC columns under artificial climate environment and electrochemical
chloride extraction: A comparative study. Constr Build Mater 2020;242:118014.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.118014.

[17] Sun F-J, Pang S-H, Zhang Z-W, Fu F, Qian K. Retrofitting seismically damaged steel
sections encased concrete composite walls using externally bonded CFRP strips.
Compos Struct 2020;236:111927. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
compstruct.2020.111927.

[18] Wang Q, Lu C-L, Zhu W, Fu F, Qian K. Axial compressive capacity of RC square
columns strengthened by prestressed CFRP with RPC pads. Compos Struct 2020;
242:112153. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112153.

[19] Li Z-X, Zhang X, Shi Y, Wu C, Li J. Finite element modeling of FRP retrofitted RC
column against blast loading. Compos Struct 2021;263:113727. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.113727.

[20] Raza S, Khan MKI, Menegon SJ, Tsang H-H, Wilson JL. Strengthening and repair of
reinforced concrete columns by jacketing: State-of-the-art review. Sustain 2019;11
(11):3208. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11113208.

[21] Ye L, Yue Q, Zhao S, Li Q. Shear Strength of Reinforced Concrete Columns
Strengthened with Carbon-Fiber-Reinforced Plastic Sheet. J Struct Eng 2002;128
(12):1527–34.

[22] Haroun MA, Elsanadedy HM. Behavior of Cyclically Loaded Squat Reinforced
Concrete Bridge Columns Upgraded with Advanced Composite-Material Jackets.
J Bridg Eng 2005;10(6):741–8.

[23] Del Vecchio C, Di Ludovico M, Prota A, Manfredi G. Modelling beam-column joints
and FRP strengthening in the seismic performance assessment of RC existing
frames. Compos Struct 2016;142:107–16. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
compstruct.2016.01.077.

[24] Ma R, Xiao Y, Li KN. Full-scale testing of a parking structure column retrofitted
with carbon fiber reinforced composites. Constr Build Mater 2000;14(2):63–71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/S0950-0618(00)00008-8.

[25] Galal K, Arafa A, Ghobarah A. Retrofit of RC square short columns. Eng Struct
2005;27(5):801–13. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2005.01.003.

[26] Wang D, Huang Le, Yu T, Wang Z. Seismic Performance of CFRP-Retrofitted Large-
Scale Square RC Columns with High Axial Compression Ratios. J Compos Constr
2017;21(5):04017031. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CC.1943-5614.0000813.

[27] Wang D, Wang Z, Yu T, Li H. Seismic performance of CFRP-retrofitted large-scale
rectangular RC columns under lateral loading in different directions. Compos
Struct 2018;192:475–88. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.029.

[28] Lee H-S, Kage T, Noguchi T, Tomosawa F. An experimental study on the retrofitting
effects of reinforced concrete columns damaged by rebar corrosion strengthened
with carbon fiber sheets. Cem Concr Res 2003;33(4):563–70. https://doi.org/
10.1016/S0008-8846(02)01004-9.

[29] Li J, Gong J, Wang L. Experimental study on seismic behavior of corroded
reinforced concrete columns strengthened with concrete jacket and CFRP. Tumu
Gongcheng Xuebao/China Civ Eng J 2009;42
[in Chinese].

[30] Li JB. Study on seismic strengthening of corroded reinforced concrete columns,
PhD Thesis 2009
[in Chinese].

[31] Li X, Zhao Z-H, Liang Y-S, Lv H-L. Cyclic behaviour of earthquakeand corrosion-
damaged RC columns. Mag Concr Res 2016;68(22):1166–82. https://doi.org/
10.1680/jmacr.16.00155.

[32] Wang Z. Experimental study on the seismic performance and reinforcement of
corroded reinforced concrete short columns. Master Thesis 2014
[in Chinese].

[33] Leng LY, Zhang PF. Research on CFRP strengthening corroded reinforced concrete
columns in seismic performance. Appl Mech Mater 2014;477-478:681–5. https://
doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.477-478.681.

[34] Bousias SN, Triantafillou TC, Fardis MN, Spathis L, O’Regan BA. Fiber-reinforced
polymer retrofitting of rectangular reinforced concrete columns with or without
corrosion. ACI Struct J 2004. https://doi.org/10.14359/13337.

[35] Rajput AS, Sharma UK. Seismic upgrade of corroded confined reinforced concrete
columns using composite materials. ACI Mater J 2019. https://doi.org/10.14359/
51716825.

[36] Rajput AS, Sharma UK, Engineer K. Seismic retrofitting of corroded RC columns
using advanced composite materials. Eng Struct 2019;181:35–46. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.12.009.

[37] Jiang FC, Jiang Y, Chen HQ, Xi YF, Ju PG. Experimental study of seismic behaviors
of corroded reinforced concrete columns strengthened with wrapped CFRP sheets.
Constr: Indust; 2013
[in Chinese].

[38] Deng ZC, Li JH, Zhang XD. Seismic Behavior of RC Corroded Columns
Strengthened With Hybrid FRP. J Beijing Univ Tech 2009
[in Chinese].

[39] Liu X, Li Y. Experimental study of seismic behavior of partially corrosion-damaged
reinforced concrete columns strengthened with FRP composites with large
deformability. Constr Build Mater 2018;191:1071–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
conbuildmat.2018.10.072.

[40] Lao TA. Seismic performance study of corroded RC columns after LRS-FRP
reinforcement. Master Thesis 2018
[in Chinese].

[41] Wei YJ. Experimental Study on Seismic Behavior of Corroded RC Piers. Master
Thesis 2018
[in Chinese].

[42] ASCE 41-17. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston, VA:
American Society of Civil Engineers; 2017.

[43] ACI. 440. Guide for the design and construction of externally bonded FRP systems
for strengthening concrete structures, ACI 440, Farmington Hills. United States
2017.

[44] JSCE. (Japan Society of Civil Engineers). Recommendations for upgrading of
concrete structures with use of continuous fiber sheet. In: Concrete Engineering
Series 2001.

[45] CNR (Italian National Research Council). Guide for the Design and Construction of
Externally Bonded FRP Systems for Strengthening Existing Structures, CNR-DT
200/. Advisory Committee on Technical Recommendations for Construction.
Rome: Italy; 2004. p. 2004.

[46] FIB (Federation International du Beton/International Federation for Structural
Concrete). Retrofitting of concrete structures by externally bonded FRPs with
emphasis on seismic applications, fib Bulletin No. 35, Lausanne, Switzerland 2006.

[47] Concrete Society of UK. Design guidance for strengthening concrete structures
using fibre composite materials, TR55, UK; 2012.

[48] GB 50608-2010. Technical code for infrastructure application of FRP composites.
Beijing: China Architecture & Building Press 2010.

[49] Panagiotakos TB, Fardis MN. Deformations of reinforced concrete members at
yielding and ultimate. ACI Struct J 2001;98. https://doi.org/10.14359/10181.

[50] Dai K-Y, Yu X-H, Lu D-G. Phenomenological hysteretic model for corroded RC
columns. Eng Struct 2020;210:110315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engstruct.2020.110315.

[51] Li B, Harries KA. Seismic performance assessment of flexure-dominate FRP-
confined RC columns using plastic rotation angle. Eng Struct 2018;172:453–71.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2018.06.046.

[52] Guo A, Li H, Ba Xi, Guan X, Li H. Experimental investigation on the cyclic
performance of reinforced concrete piers with chloride-induced corrosion in
marine environment. Eng Struct 2015;105:1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engstruct.2015.09.031.

[53] ASCE 41-13. Seismic Evaluation and Retrofit of Existing Buildings. Reston, VA:
American Society of Civil Engineers; 2014.

[54] Elwood KJ, Eberhard MO. Effective stiffness of reinforced concrete columns. ACI
Struct J 2009. https://doi.org/10.14359/56613.

[55] Park R. Evaluation of ductility of structures and structural assemblages from
laboratory testing. Bull New Zeal Soc Earthq Eng 1989;22(3):155–66. https://doi.
org/10.5459/bnzsee.22.3.155-166.

[56] Yu X, Lu D, Li B. Estimating uncertainty in limit state capacities for reinforced
concrete frame structures through pushover analysis. Earthquakes and Structures
2016;10(1):141–61.

[57] Seible F, Priestley MJN, Hegemier GA, Innamorato D. Seismic Retrofit of RC
Columns with Continuous Carbon Fiber Jackets. J Compos Constr 1997;1(2):
52–62.

[58] Ozcan O, Binici B, Ozcebe G. Seismic strengthening of rectangular reinforced
concrete columns using fiber reinforced polymers. Eng Struct 2010;32(4):964–73.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2009.12.021.

[59] Yuan F, Wu Y-F, Li C-Q. Modelling plastic hinge of FRP-confined RC columns. Eng
Struct 2017;131:651–68. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2016.10.018.

[60] Binici B. Design of FRPs in circular bridge column retrofits for ductility
enhancement. Eng Struct 2008;30(3):766–76. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.
engstruct.2007.05.012.

[61] Gu D-S, Wu Y-F, Wu G, Wu Z-S. Plastic hinge analysis of FRP confined circular
concrete columns. Constr Build Mater 2012;27(1):223–33. https://doi.org/
10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2011.07.056.

[62] Youssf O, ElGawady MA, Mills JE. Displacement and plastic hinge length of FRP-
confined circular reinforced concrete columns. Eng Struct 2015;101:465–76.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.engstruct.2015.07.026.

[63] Paulay T, Priestly MJN. Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete and Masonry
Buildings 1992. https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172841.

[64] Priestley MJN, Seible F, Calvi GM. Seismic Design and Retrofit of. Bridges 1996.
https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470172858.

[65] Chattefuee S, Hadi AS. Regression Analysis by Example: Fourth Edition 2006.
https://doi.org/10.1002/0470055464.

[66] John F. Applied regression analysis and generalized linear models. 3th ed. SAGE;
2016.

[67] Akaike H. A New Look at the Statistical Model Identification. IEEE Trans Automat
Contr 1974;19(6):716–23. https://doi.org/10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705.

[68] Wang DY. Experimental and analytical investigation of seismic performance of
nonductile RC frames retrofitted with FRP. PhD Thesis 2012.

[69] Ghannoum WM, Matamoros AB. Nonlinear modeling parameters and acceptance
criteria for concrete columns. ACI Spec Publ 2014;297.

[70] Baker JW. Efficient analytical fragility function fitting using dynamic structural
analysis. Earthq Spectra 2015;31(1):579–99. https://doi.org/10.1193/
021113EQS025M.
10.1007/s10518-020-00883-3.

  • 引用本文

Kuang-Yu Dai, Xiao-Hui Yu , Kai Qian, Dai-Yu Wang. Deformation capacity of FRP retrofitted reinforced concrete columns with corroded reinforcing bars [J]. Engineering Structures. 2022; ; (113834). - .

  • 文献评论

2026-06-16 08:14:16西部**

研究方法不错,结果比较可靠。


2025-12-23 09:16:42余**重庆科技******已认证✔

本篇论文结构清晰、数据扎实、工程价值很高。研究聚焦于既有锈蚀钢筋混凝土柱经过FRP加固后的变形能力评估,切中当前城市更新、老旧建筑抗震加固的工程通电,尤其是在高腐蚀、高地震风险地区,具有显著的工程价值。作者整合了80组实验数据,以FRP材料、截面形式、腐蚀成都和加载方式为参数,数据覆盖面广,为模型的建立奠定了坚实的基础。通过引入锈蚀影响因子将问题拆分为“未锈蚀FRP柱变形能力”与“锈蚀影响”两部分,分别建模再耦合,逻辑非常清晰。最终模型输出直接与ASCE 41规范中的非线性参数a对接,明确了不同安全等级下的建议取值,便于工程师直接使用,具有较强的规范适配性。