基于大豆过敏蛋白的植物替代蛋白产品真实性研究-食品安全质量检测学报-CSCIED科技核心评价数据库

推荐文章

Soil Health as a Dynamic, Plant-Specific Attribute: Redefining Its Role Beyond Traditional Soil Quality Indicators

基于大豆过敏蛋白的植物替代蛋白产品真实性研究

Study on the authenticity determination of plant-based proteins based on soybean allergens

ES评分9 浏览量：956 下载量：1 评价量：2

全文阅读下载引用收藏评论

DOI	10.19812/j.cnki.jfsq11-5956/ts.20241224001
刊名	食品安全质量检测学报 Journal of Food Safety and Quality
年，卷(期)	2025, 16(12)
作者	王宣, 黄俊恺, 孔维恒, 王娟强, 张颖颖, 郭文萍, 赵文涛*,
作者单位	中国肉类食品综合研究中心; 中国海关科学技术研究中心
摘要	目的基于超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法建立植物替代蛋白产品中大豆过敏蛋白的检测方法, 开展植物替代蛋白产品中过敏蛋白的定量和真实性判定研究。方法大豆分离蛋白经胰蛋白酶水解后, 通过高分辨质谱采集数据并与Uniprot数据库匹配, 筛选出大豆特异性过敏蛋白多肽, 并采用响应面设计优化过敏蛋白提取条件, 从而构建过敏原定量方法。对市售植物替代蛋白产品进行实际样品检测, 初步得到不同植物替代蛋白产品中大豆过敏蛋白含量。结果筛选出线性较好的6种大豆定量多肽、相关系数均大于0.995, 方法检出限为0.182~2.080 μg/g、方法定量限为0.607~6.920 μg/g, 回收率为97.1%~126.6%, 日内精密度为5.17%~10.20%, 日间精密度为5.02%~11.70%。结论本方法特异性强、灵敏度高, 可以较好地针对植物替代蛋白产品进行检测, 实现了在无同位素标记肽段的情况下对大豆过敏蛋白的准确定量。在植物替代蛋白产品的过敏蛋白检测上具有较好的应用前景, 同时可实现植物替代蛋白产品的掺假鉴别及食品标签的过敏信息判别。
Abstract	Objective To establish a detection method for soybean allergens in plant-based protein products based on ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry, and conduct research on the quantification and authenticity determination of allergy protein in plant-based protein products. Methods After the soybean protein isolate was hydrolyzed by trypsin, the data were collected by high resolution mass spectrometry and matched with the Uniprot database to screen out the soybean specific allergen peptides. The response surface design was adopted to optimize the extraction conditions of the allergen protein, thereby constructing the quantitative method of allergens. Actual sample tests were conducted on commercially available plant-based protein products to preliminarily obtain the content of soybean allergy proteins in different plant-based protein products. Results The 6 kinds of soybean quantitative peptides with good linearity and correlation coefficients above 0.995 were selected. The limits of detection and the limits of quantification of the method were 0.182–2.08 μg/g and 0.607–6.920 μg/g. The spiked recoveries were 97.1%–126.6% and the intra-day and inter-day precisions were 5.17%–10.20% and 5.02%–11.70%. Conclusion This method has strong specificity and high sensitivity, and can well detect plant-based protein products, achieving accurate quantification of soybean allergens without isotope-labeled peptide segments. It has a good application prospect in the detection of allergen in plant-based protein products. Meanwhile, it can achieve the identification of adulteration in plant-based protein products and the discrimination of allergic information on food labels.
关键词	植物替代蛋白产品、大豆过敏蛋白、超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法、特征多肽、响应面优化
KeyWord	plant-based proteins; soybean allergens proteins; ultra performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry; specific peptide; response surface optimization
基金项目
页码	59-68

参考文献
相关文献

[1]SIM SYJ, SRV A, CHIANG JH, et al. Plant proteins for future foods: A roadmap
[J]. Foods, 2021, 10(8): 1967.

[2]QIN P, WANG T, LUO Y. A review on plant-based proteins from soybean: Health benefits and soy product development
[J]. Journal of Agriculture and Food Research, 2022, 7: 100265.

[3]SIEGRIST M, MICHEL F, HARTMANN C. The shift from meat to plant-based proteins: Consumers and public policy
[J]. Current Opinion in Food Science, 2024, 58: 101182.

[4]THAKUR S, PANDEY AK, VERMA K, et al. Plant-based protein as an alternative to animal proteins: A review of sources, extraction methods and applications
[J]. International Journal of Food Science & Technology, 2024, 59(1): 488–497.

[5]王玉翔, 郑召君, 刘元法. 植物蛋白纤维制备技术及其在食品领域的应用
[J]. 食品科学, 2023, 44(17): 286–304.
WANG YX, ZHENG ZJ, LIU YF. Preparation of plant protein fiber and its application in the food field: A review of recent research
[J]. Food Science, 2023, 44(17): 286–304.

[6]ONWEZEN MC, BOUWMAN EP, REINDERS MJ, et al. A systematic review on consumer acceptance of alternative proteins: Pulses, algae, insects, plant-based meat alternatives, and cultured meat
[J]. Appetite, 2021, 159: 105058.

[7]MALILA Y, OWOLABI IO, CHOTANAPHUTI T, et al. Current challenges of alternative proteins as future foods
[J]. Npj Science of Food, 2024, 8(1): 53.

[8]LOH W, TANG MLK. The epidemiology of food allergy in the global context
[J]. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 2018, 15(9). DOI: 10.3390/ijerph15092043

[9]宁亚维, 杨正, 马梦戈, 等. 食品中常见过敏原及检测技术研究进展
[J]. 食品科学, 2021, 42(15): 319–328.
NING YW, YANG Z, MA MG, et al. Progress in common food allergens and technologies for their detection
[J]. Food Science, 2021, 42(15): 319–328.

[10]MONACI L, DE-ANGELIS E, MONTEMURRO N, et al. Comprehensive overview and recent advances in proteomics MS based methods for food allergens analysis
[J]. TrAC Trends in Analytical Chemistry, 2018, 106: 21–36.

[11]COSTA J, AMARAL JS, GRAZINA L, et al. Matrix-normalised real-time PCR approach to quantify soybean as a potential food allergen as affected by thermal processing
[J]. Food Science, 2017, 221: 1843–1850.

[12]丁亮, 付琳, 吴秀莲, 等. 基于蛋白质和DNA的食品过敏原检测技术的研究进展
[J]. 中国酿造, 2017, 36(7): 157–160.
DING L, FU L, WU XL, et al. Recent advance of detection technology of food allergens based on protein and DNA
[J]. China Brewing, 2017, 36(7): 157–160.

[13]VILLA C, COSTA J, MAFRA I. Detection and quantification of milk ingredients as hidden allergens in meat products by a novel specific real-time PCR method
[J]. Biomolecules, 2019, 9(12). DOI: 10.3390/biom9120804

[14]JIN J, GAN K, ZHAO L, et al. Peach allergen Pru p 1 content is generally low in fruit but with large variation in different varieties
[J]. Clinical and Translational Allergy, 2021, 11(3): e12034.

[15]PLANQUE M, ARNOULD T, DIEU M, et al. Liquid chromatography coupled to tandem mass spectrometry for detecting ten allergens in complex and incurred foodstuffs
[J]. Journal of Chromatography A, 2017, 1530: 138–151.

[16]KORTE R, OBERLEITNER D, BROCKMEYER J. Determination of food allergens by LC-MS: Impacts of sample preparation, food matrix, and thermal processing on peptide detectability and quantification
[J]. Journal of Proteomics, 2019, 196: 131–140.

[17]STELLA R, SETTE G, MORESSA A, et al. LC-HRMS/MS for the simultaneous determination of four allergens in fish and swine food products
[J]. Food Chemistry, 2020, 331: 127276.

[18]王雅清, 倪皓洁, 李华韬, 等. 食物过敏原检测技术研究进展
[J]. 食品工业科技, 2019, 40(13): 264–70.
WANG YQ, NI HJ, LI HT, et al. Research advance in detection technology for food allergen
[J].?Science and Technology of Food Industry, 2019, 40(13): 264–270.

[19]ZHU L, LI S, SUN L, et al. Development and validation of a specific sandwich ELISA for determination of soybean allergens and its application in processed foods
[J]. Process Biochemistry, 2022, 117: 134–141.

[20]宁亚维, 刘茁, 范素芳, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法检测食品中鸡蛋过敏原卵白蛋白
[J]. 食品科学, 2018, 39(20): 332–336.
NING YW, LIU Z, FAN SF, et al. Detection of egg allergen ovalbumin in food by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
[J]. Food Science, 2018, 39(20): 332–336.

[21]李丽芳, 黄文胜, 张九凯, 等. 超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法检测大豆主要过敏原蛋白
[J]. 食品科学, 2020, 41(24): 316–324.
LI LF, HUANG WS, ZHANG JK, et al. Determination of major soybean allergens by ultra-high performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry
[J]. Food Science, 2020, 41(24): 316–324.

[22]MONTOWSKA M, FORNAL E. Detection of peptide markers of soy, milk and egg white allergenic proteins in poultry products by LC-Q-TOF-MS/MS
[J]. LWT-Food Science and Technology, 2018, 87: 310–317.

[23]YOSHIMITSU M, KIYOTA K, KAJIMURA K, et al. Development of an LC-MS/MS-based analytical method for quantification of soybean allergen Gly m 4 in soybean grains and processed foods
[J]. Food and Agricultural Immunology, 2019, 30(1): 25–33.

[24]ZHANG Y, LIU M, WANG S, et al. Identification and quantification of fox meat in meat products by liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry
[J]. Food Chemistry, 2022, 372: 131336.

[25]ZHANG M, LI Y, ZHANG Y, et al. Rapid LC-MS/MS method for the detection of seven animal species in meat products
[J]. Food Chemistry, 2022, 371: 131075.

[26]HOUSTON NL, LEE DG, STEVENSON SE, et al. Quantitation of soybean allergens using tandem mass spectrometry
[J]. Journal of Proteome Research, 2011, 10(2): 763–773.

[27]PATRA A, ARUN-PRASATH V, PANDISELVAM R. Deep eutectic solvent: An emerging trend for extraction of plant proteins
[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2023, 389: 122887.

[28]TANG J, YAO D, XIA S, et al. Recent progress in plantbased proteins: From extraction and modification methods to applications in the food industry
[J]. Food Chemistry: X, 2024, 23: 101540.

[29]YAP PG, GAN CY. Exploration of potential application of low phytotoxic alkaline deep eutectic solvent (DES) in protein extraction and bioactive applications
[J]. Journal of Molecular Liquids, 2024, 409: 125521.

[30]ALSHAMMARI OAO, ALMULGABSAGHER GAA, RYDER KS, et al. Effect of solute polarity on extraction efficiency using deep eutectic solvents
[J]. Green Chemistry, 2021, 23(14): 5097–5105.

[31]MANSURI MS, BATHLA S, LAM TT, et al. Optimal conditions for carrying out trypsin digestions on complex proteomes: From bulk samples to single cells
[J]. Journal of Proteomics, 2024, 297: 105109.

[32]HUSTOFT HK, MALER?D H, WILSON SR, et al. A critical review of trypsin digestion for LC-MS based proteomics
[C]. Integrative Proteomics, 2012.

[33]李湘, 彭地纬, 熊华, 等. 胰蛋白酶有限酶解米渣蛋白的机理及动力学模型研究
[J]. 食品科学, 2010, 30(21): 166–171.
LI X, PENG DW, XIONG H, et al. Mechanism and kinetic model for limited trypsin digestion of protein in rice dregs
[J]. Food Science, 2009, 30(21): 166–171.

引用本文

王宣, 黄俊恺, 孔维恒, 王娟强, 张颖颖, 郭文萍, 赵文涛*. 基于大豆过敏蛋白的植物替代蛋白产品真实性研究 [J]. 食品安全质量检测学报. 2025; 16; (12). 59 - 68.

文献评论

2025-11-04 07:40:43张**东北农业******已认证✔

该研究建立了基于超高效液相色谱-串联质谱法用于植物替代蛋白产品中大豆过敏蛋白的检测，在植物替代蛋白产品的过敏蛋白检测方面具有较好的应用潜力, 也为植物替代蛋白产品的掺假鉴别及食品标签的过敏信息判别提供了技术支撑。

2025-10-14 11:16:14刘**新疆维吾******已认证✔

该研究针对植物替代蛋白产品大豆过敏蛋白检测与真实性判定的行业痛点，建立超高效液相色谱 - 串联质谱检测方法，选题贴合食品安全监管与过敏人群健康保障需求，应用价值明确。实验设计严谨，通过高分辨质谱结合数据库筛选出 6 种高特异性大豆定量多肽，经响应面优化提取条件，方法学验证显示相关系数＞0.995，检出限、回收..

相关学者

相关机构

推荐文章