热门期刊: 细胞研究(英文版)、 中华医学杂志(英文版)、国际临床研究杂志 等
罗哌卡因在临床麻醉及疼痛治疗中的应用分析
Application of Ropivacaine in clinical anesthesia and pain treatment
ES评分0
DOI | 10.12208/j. ijsr.202100011 |
刊名 |
International Journal of Surgical Research
|
年,卷(期) | 2021, 4(1) |
作者 |
乔杰*,
|
作者单位 |
哈尔滨宾县人民医院 黑龙江哈尔滨 ; |
摘要 |
分析罗哌卡因在临床麻醉及疼痛治疗中的应用价值。方法 选取我院接受手术治疗的患者100例,分为A、B两组进行观察,比较两组患者VAS、Bromage评级、麻醉麻醉相关指标以及不良反应情况。结果 B组手术后麻醉效果(Bromage)评级好于与A组;手术后自主呼吸恢复时间(11.5±2.5)h、苏醒时间(23.1±4.0)h,均短于A组(16.3±3.3)h、(39.2±5.0)h P<0.05。同时两组患者VAS评分差异P>0.05,以及术后麻醉不良反应发生率比较,A组13.00%(13/100),B组11.00%(11/100)差异不具备统计价值P>0.05。结论 针对手术治疗患者使用罗唯卡因麻醉和镇痛效果较好,安全性更高。
Objective to analyze the application value of ropivacaine in clinical anesthesia and pain treatment. Methods 200 patients were divided into two groups: Group A and Group B, and their VAS, Bromage scores, anesthesia related indexes and adverse reactions were compared. Results the recovery time of spontaneous respiration (11.5 ± 2.5) H and recovery time (23.1 ± 4.0) H were shorter in Group B than in Group A (16.3 ± 3.3) H and (39.2 ± 5.0) H P & Lt; 0.05. At the same time, the difference of Vas Score (P & GT; 0.05) between the two groups and the incidence of adverse reaction after anesthesia were compared. The Difference Between Group A (13/100) and Group B (11/100) was not statistically significant (P & GT; 0.05) . Conclusion: Rovicaine is more effective and safer in anesthesia and Analgesia for surgical patients.
|
关键词 |
罗哌卡因;麻醉;疼痛治疗;应用分析
Ropivacaine; Anesthesia; Pain management; Applied analysis
|
基金项目 | |
页码 | 33-35 |